Looks like the Obama administration is looking to ban sugary beverages and candy from public schools. They would also require more nutritious options. This is going to be interesting...via the NYT:
The legislation would reauthorize the government’s school breakfast and lunch programs. It aims to transform the eating habits of many of the nation’s children and teenagers, but some school officials say it will further crimp already strained budgets.I kind of agree with the critics here. First of all, my child's health is my respnsibility not President Obama's.
In addition to banning sugary treats, the new rules would require many schools to offer more nutritious options, which could be expensive. The administration has proposed spending $1 billion more each year on the $18 billion meals program, but the increase may not be enough to cover the extra costs.
Secondly, instead of focusing legislation, time, energy, and money on a program like this why don't they use the same time, energy, and money to create better resources for parents, fund educational projects that help teach kids about health and fitness, encourage better physical fitness programs. The goal should be to incite a better educated public instead of simply restricting the availability of bad things...eventually, people are going to have to make a decision about good and bad.
Helping children avoid a problem (like extremely unhealthy snacks) is not better then teaching them how to deal with the problematic choice when confronted with it - just like the old saying says, "Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish; and you have fed him for a lifetime" Leia Mais…


